ATM authorisations dominate its disclosed capital, so any comparison with private superconducting peers must first separate programme size from cash received.
This profile is a single-company view of the same public ledger that builds the global ranking. Figures are disclosed amounts, not valuations; an empty cell means the source did not publish a number.
| Headquarters / founded | Berkeley, CA · 2013 |
|---|---|
| Technology | quantum-computing · Superconducting |
| Region / country | United States · United States |
| Status | public · Nasdaq: RGTI |
| Cumulative disclosed funding | ~$700M (lower bound) |
| Global rank | #8 / 62 |
The values below are computed on this build from the live dataset. They are measurements, not commentary.
| Share of all tracked capital | 4.15% |
|---|---|
| Median, same technology | $85M |
| Median, same region | $370M |
| Nearest larger peer (same technology) | IQM Quantum Computers · $710M |
| Nearest smaller peer (same technology) | Pasqal · $590M |
| Published financing events | 2 |
| Cash disclosed across those events | $350M |
| Policy / public-market events | 1 / 1 |
| Unreviewed auto-collected events | 0 |
| Syndicated reports merged into these rows | 0 |
The ~$350M ATM authorisation is drawn down in tranches, so the useful number for a ranking is the programme size, not an imagined closing date. Rigetti Computing builds superconducting processors, where fabrication commitments are lumpy; an ATM gives a listed company flexibility that a private Series round does not. Our ledger keeps this separate from venture capital and marks it as public-market financing.
Rigetti's letter of intent sits next to a $350M ATM authorisation in our ledger, which makes the distinction easy to test: one is a drawdown facility a listed company controls, the other a government statement of intent with no scheduled disbursement. Superconducting fabrication access is the plausible policy rationale, but the notice publishes neither a figure nor a milestone. We keep both rows separate and never fold a policy notice into an at-the-market total.
At-the-market programmes are disclosed as maximum aggregate offering prices. Actual issuance is reported in later filings, which this ledger does not reconstruct into a second event.